Looks like most of you would like to have an invisible best friend over encounters with aliens.
My next poll is one Scott and I have been talking about lately. We're probably going to start to try to sell our home starting in April and we're wondering which would be better; to have a great home in an ok location or vice versa? Obviously to have both would be ideal but I doubt we can afford that so we'll probably have to sacrifice somewhere. At least we want to be prepared for whatever decision we have to make. So please vote, I'm eager to see what people think.
Currently Reading:
Super Baby Food
About Me
- Jen Elder
- I am very happily married in the little town of Stewartville, MN. My husband and I work together as photographers for our company Midwest Lifeshots Photography. Go to www.MidwestLifeshots.com for more infromation and to see some of our work. We also do virtual tours and still photography for Realtors in the area. We recently had our first child, Emily Mae born April 11th 2009. Te've been enjoying her so much!! We feel very blessed with all the people in our lives and our relationship between the two of us as well as the excitement of our little one. God bless.
2 comments:
I voted OK house good location. Especially with the rising energy costs it'd be great to live in an area where I didn't have to use my car to get everywhere. I think that will pay itself off in the long run.
I agree with Matt. I would much rather be in a good location. As long as the house has a few minimal requirements (i.e. a spot for a large screen TV and the sound system), then I could be content. Of course, this poll begs the follow up question of, "How do you define a good location?"
Post a Comment